Quantifying the shadow economy

Intra-Community trade fraud leads to major tax gap in Finland too

VAT losses due to intra-Community trade fraud amount to at least tens of millions of euros a year in Finland.

Fraudsters abscond once they have reaped the tax benefits

According to the European Commission, tax fraud in intra-Community trade causes VAT losses of as much as EUR 50 billion annually. VAT fraud cases in intra-Community trade are complex and such schemes often involve numerous actors in different countries. One of the key roles is that of the fraudulent intra-Community purchaser – referred to as a “missing trader.”

Missing traders are often fictitious companies that do not engage in actual business operations. During a four-year monitoring period, at least 100 intra-Community purchasers were active in Finland that had indications of intentional neglect of VAT.

Such missing traders caused a tax gap of about EUR 12-15 million per year. When other fraudulent actors connected to these missing traders are counted, the tax gap can rise to as much as EUR 35 million per year.

Fraudsters stand out

Special profiling was used to identify companies that probably engage in fraudulent intra-Community trade. Examination of the identified fraudulent companies could also be used to estimate the shadow economy VAT gap caused by intra-Community trade in Finland.

The missing traders identified during profiling were primarily limited companies. They most commonly engaged in wholesale, retail and construction. Such companies were often subject to assessment by estimation, and it was common for them to have tax debts. These companies paid scant taxes to the Tax Administration.

Missing traders comprise clusters of companies in the shadow economy – further research is needed

In terms of their operations, the missing traders identified during profiling were exceptionally strongly grouped in clusters of several companies. In addition, it was far more common than usual for these companies and their responsible officers to be connected to companies entered in the Estonian Trade Register. The largest cluster of companies in the target group comprised a total of 99 companies, 62 of which were Estonian.

Profiling and estimates were based on fraudulent actors found in tax audits. As few shadow economy cases had been analysed, statistically speaking, the analysis could only cover one role in intra-Community fraud: missing traders. Assessing the total tax gap caused by intra-Community fraud in Finland would require a more detailed analysis of other roles.

This article is based on a report by the Grey Economy Information Unit 1/2018

Read more (in Finnish)


Companies identify the grey economy less frequently than before

In the autumn of 2017, the Tax Administration surveyed Finnish companies and entities’ views and attitudes towards taxes and the Tax Administration. Among other things, respondents were asked about the ways in which the values and strategy of the Tax Administration are visible to customers.

Of the strategic objectives, “it is worth for taxpayers to meet their obligations in full” was considered the objective with the most potential to be realised. No less than nine out of ten respondents felt this way. Only a small percentage of the respondents took the opposite view. At the same time, three out of four respondents were of the opinion that there are “minimal opportunities for error”. Nearly a fifth of respondents nevertheless felt that this had not been achieved.

An interesting detail revealed by the results was that the number of customers who agreed with the claim “I know or know of a company that has bought or sold goods or services undeclared, without receipts” had halved in the course of four years. In 2015, nearly a third of the respondents knew or knew of a company that has bought or sold goods or services undeclared, without receipts. This time around, 17 per cent of respondents agreed with the claim.

“Given that the percentage has declined systematically during the past two surveys, it is fairly safe to say that the trend is indeed declining,” says Janne Myyry, the Tax Administration’s research expert.

Customers also think that the Tax Administration’s values are realised well in its activities. Four out of five customers were of the opinion that the Tax Administration trusts its customers and operates in a way that allows customers to trust the operations of the Tax Administration.

The survey was conducted in the autumn of 2017 in the form of phone interviews to companies of various sizes, chosen through random selection. The survey has been conducted every two years.

Further information (in Finnish)

Legal changes in the construction sector increased national tax revenue

Legislation changes made in the construction sector since 2011 – such as the VAT reverse charge, the Public Register of Tax Numbers, and contract and employee reporting – increased the payroll in the construction sector in 2015 by around €300 million in total. National tax revenue grew by €100 million in the same year.

Further, reporting of contract and employee details in the construction sector increased the tax revenue by €31 million. The increase was attributable to both employer’s contributions and VAT.

Foreign labour now better accounted for

With the extended duty to report on foreign employees, the number of foreign labour reported to the Tax Adminstration has increased. Wages paid to foreign employees now fall within the scope of taxation better than before.

The Tax Administration’s Grey Economy Information Unit studied how the legislation relating to the requirement of reporting on contract and employee details has affected the construction sector.

Read more (in Finnish)

Estimate: More than half of the tax gap is attributable to intentional neglect

In Great Britain, conscious and intentional neglect is estimated to account for around 54 percent of the total tax gap. The remaining 46 percent are estimated to consist of errors and negligence, insolvency and disputes about the interpretation of law.

The tax gap means the difference between the theoretical tax receivable and the actual tax revenue. The size of the tax gap shows to what extent the tax payment obligations are met.

The Grey Economy Information Unit has published a Finnish translation of Great Britain’s tax gap report Measuring tax gaps 2014. One aspect analysed in the report is the division of the tax gap based on taxpayer behaviour.

Read more (in Finnish)

The reverse charge mechanism in the construction industry increased VAT revenue by at least €75 million a year

The VAT reverse charge in the construction industry entered into force on 1 April 2011. The reverse charge mechanism means that the main contractor in a construction contract chain pays the Finnish Tax Administration the value added tax on all the construction services included in the contract.

On account of the amended legislation, the portion of VAT payable by main contractors has increaed significantly and the portion payable by subcontractors in the lowest level has decreased correspondingly.

The Grey Economy Information Unit has calculated the impact of the VAT reverse charge on VAT revenue in the “F Construction” sector.  The calculation was based on analysing the transaction data of the tax account and the data in periodic tax returns submitted to the Tax Administration. The data before and after the tax reform were compared.

Read more (in Finnish)

The reverse charge mechanism in the scrap industry would increase tax revenue by around €7–8 million a year

Tax audits performed in the scrap industry have revealed concealed sales, unjust VAT deductions and failures to report and pay taxes. Other shadow economy phenomena detected include straw men and the use of fake sales receipts.

The scrap trade report surveys the shadow economy activities detected in tax audits in the scrap industry, and particularly their effect on VAT revenue.

The report also discusses the application of the VAT reverse charge to scrap trade in Finland – how many companies would fall within the scope of the reverse charge and how big a benefit could be achieved by amending the legislation.

Read more (in Finnish)